<Merry Christmas ⁄>
<myBlog show="last" ⁄>
<mySnippets order="rand" ⁄>
<myPhoto order="random" ⁄>
<mySnippets type="lang" ⁄>
<myQuote order="random" ⁄>
<myContacts ⁄><email ⁄>
<windows live messenger ⁄>
<myCurriculum type="pdf" ⁄>
<myVisitorsMap ⁄>
<myValidation ⁄>This is my second post in the Just Science Week Challenge.
This 2003 paper in Physical Review Letters puts a lower limit on the size of the universe at no smaller than 46.5 billion light years in radius. If the universe is geometrically flat, that is.
In this video I made on the Hubble Deep Field, I mentioned this number and was immediately inundated with questions and comments from people screaming that that number could not possibly be correct. How can the universe be that big if the fastest anything can travel is the speed of light? The universe simply CAN'T be larger than the distance light travels during age of the universe, right?
este é só um excerto do artigo, para aceder ao artigo completo, clique no link em baixo:
this is just a small excerpt from the article, to access the full article please click in the link below:
http://www.astronomybuff.com/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-...
<myNews show="rand" cat="ciencia" ⁄>